[Successful polatuzumab vedotin and rituximab therapy for post-CAR-T relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

Relapse or progressive disease after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment remains a major issue for poor-risk aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. However, limited data are available on post-CAR-T use of polatuzumab vedotin. Here we describe the case of a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who experienced relapse three months after CD19-directed CAR-T therapy with tisagenlecleucel. However, the relapsed lesions rapidly disappeared following treatment with polatuzumab vedotin and rituximab. Notably, long-term remission was achieved without severe cytopenia, infections or peripheral neuropathy, showing the therapeutic benefit of polatuzumab vedotin for CAR-T failure.

A practical guide to the management of immune thrombocytopenia co-existing with acute coronary syndrome.

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) management with co-existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains challenging as it requires a clinically relevant balance between the risk and outcomes of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding. However, the literature evaluating the treatment approaches in this high-risk population is scarce. Methods and Results: In this review, we aimed to summarize the available literature on the safety of ITP first- and second-line therapies to provide a practical guide on the management of ITP co-existing with ACS. We recommend holding antithrombotic therapy, including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation, in severe thrombocytopenia with a platelet count < 30 × 109/L and using a single antiplatelet agent when the platelet count falls between 30 and 50 × 109/L. We provide a stepwise approach according to platelet count and response to initial therapy, starting with corticosteroids, with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with a dose limit of 35 g, followed by thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to a target platelet count of 200 × 109/L and then rituximab. Conclusion: Our review may serve as a practical guide for clinicians in the management of ITP co-existing with ACS.

BCD020 rituximab bioanalog compared to standard treatment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: The data of 12 months case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease. Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood. There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment (SOCT), including steroid toxicity. Rituximab (RTX) is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE. AIM: To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT. METHODS: The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years, were analyzed. The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria. We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX. Laboratory data, doses of glucocorticosteroids, disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI, and organ damage were assessed at the time of initiation of therapy and one year later. RESULTS: Patients, treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement, compared to patients with SOCT. One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI activity index) in the children who received RTX [-19 points (17; 23) since baseline] compared to children with SOCT [-10 (5; 15.5) points since baseline, P = 0.001], the number of patients with active lupus nephritis, and daily proteinuria. During RTX therapy, infectious diseases had three patients; one patient developed a bi-cytopenia. CONCLUSION: RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE, due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.

Functional genomics identifies N-acetyllactosamine extension of complex N-glycans as a mechanism to evade lysis by natural killer cells.

Natural killer (NK) cells are primary defenders against cancer precursors, but cancer cells can persist by evading immune surveillance. To investigate the genetic mechanisms underlying this evasion, we perform a genome-wide CRISPR screen using B lymphoblastoid cells. SPPL3, a peptidase that cleaves glycosyltransferases in the Golgi, emerges as a top hit facilitating evasion from NK cytotoxicity. SPPL3-deleted cells accumulate glycosyltransferases and complex N-glycans, disrupting not only binding of ligands to NK receptors but also binding of rituximab, a CD20 antibody approved for treating B cell cancers. Notably, inhibiting N-glycan maturation restores receptor binding and sensitivity to NK cells. A secondary CRISPR screen in SPPL3-deficient cells identifies B3GNT2, a transferase-mediating poly-LacNAc extension, as crucial for resistance. Mass spectrometry confirms enrichment of N-glycans bearing poly-LacNAc upon SPPL3 loss. Collectively, our study shows the essential role of SPPL3 and poly-LacNAc in cancer immune evasion, suggesting a promising target for cancer treatment.

Dental Adverse Effects of Anti-CD20 Therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past few years, anti-CD20 therapies like rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab have seen an increase in interest in the treatment of neurological autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), or resistant forms of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). They are generally well-tolerated, but recent reports have highlighted severe dental disorders in patients undergoing anti-CD20 therapies. The aim was to describe a series of cases and to compare with the available scientific literature. METHODS: We reviewed 6 patient cases with dental disorders during anti-CD20 therapy that were reported to the pharmacovigilance center. A disproportionality analysis was also conducted on Vigibase® for each anti-CD20 and each adverse effect described in the cases. RESULTS: Six cases of dental and gingival conditions in relatively young patients were reported (median age: 40.5 years old [min: 34; max: 79]). Oral conditions were developed in four patients with MS treated with ocrelizumab and in two patients receiving rituximab (one patient with MG and one with NMOSD). The onset of oral conditions ranged from 10 days to 2 years after treatment initiation. Notably, all patients treated with ocrelizumab experienced gingival recession. Various dental pathologies were observed, including tooth loss, dental pain, caries, brittle teeth, dental fractures, dental abscesses, and periodontitis. Analysis of Vigibase® revealed 284 worldwide cases of dental and gingival conditions under ocrelizumab, 386 cases under rituximab, and 80 under ofatumumab. Significant associations were found between these therapies and dental pathologies, particularly tooth abscesses and infections. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting dental conditions developed in patients long-term treated with anti-CD20 treatments. This issue, literature data, and Vigilyze® analysis might be considered a safety signal that necessitates being confirmed with more robust data, such as a retrospective study with a control group. Meanwhile, proactive measures are essential like frequent dental checkups and dental hygienic measures to prevent oral health problems associated with anti-CD20 therapies.

Switching from natalizumab to an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Use of natalizumab (NTZ) is precluded in many Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Regardless, some patients may commence natalizumab for short term disease control in spite of being seropositive, and others may seroconvert whilst on treatment. In these circumstances, discontinuation of NTZ should not occur until a clear exit strategy is established to prevent post-NTZ disease reactivation, which often exceeds the severity of disease activity prior to NTZ treatment. The objective of this systematic review was to summarise the available evidence for CD20-monoclonal antibodies (CD20mAb) as a suitable NTZ exit strategy, and to identify whether a superior switch protocol can be established. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a total of 2393 references were extracted from a search of three online databases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE). Following the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 5 studies representing 331 patients were included. RESULTS: The overall incidence of clinical relapse during washout periods ranging from 4.4-10.7 weeks was 0 %. The incidence of clinical relapse during two-year follow-up ranged from 1.8 % to 10 % for switches to all types of CD20 monoclonal antibody. The weighted mean for clinical relapse at 12 months was 8.8 %. Three studies reported an annualised relapse rate (ARR) ranging from 0.02-0.12 with a weighted mean ARR of 0.07. The overall incidence of PML during washout was 0 % and the overall incidence of PML within 6 months follow-up was 0.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the first attempt at identifying a superior switch protocol in patients at risk of PML transitioning from NTZ to a CD20mAb. Our results indicate that CD20mAb's are a suitable transitional option for patients who discontinue NTZ, with our cohort demonstrating very low rates of carryover PML and low rates of clinical relapse. The most appropriate washout period is unclear due to confounding factors but is likely between 4 and 12 weeks.

Rituximab/Mycophenolate Combination Therapy in Children with Calcineurin Inhibitor-Resistant FSGS.

Introduction: There is a paucity of data and therapeutic options nationally and internationally on calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-resistant forms of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in children. CNI (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) are proven monotherapy in children with FSGS with a steroid-dependent (SD) or steroid-resistant (SR) course. We analyzed a novel therapeutic option in CNI-resistant FSGS by using the dual therapy of rituximab and mycophenolate to maintain remission. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of clinical, therapeutic profile, and treatment outcomes (sustained remission versus no remission) in subjects with CNI-resistant FSGS who received dual rituximab therapy along with mycophenolate as maintenance therapy for a minimum of 1 year. Results: The median age of presentation of 13 recruited children was 7.8 years (range: 2.4-17.6 years); nine (69.2%) were males. Ten (76.9%) of them had an SD course and three (23.1%) had an SR course. Four (30.7%) had evidence of acute/chronic CNI toxicity, and the remaining nine (69.3%) showed no response to CNI therapy despite adequate trough levels. Post dual therapy, 11 (84.6%) had sustained remission for at 1 year and two (15.4%) children did not show remission. None reported adverse reactions or infections, and all had preserved renal functions. Conclusion: Dual combination therapy with rituximab and mycophenolate among children with CNI-resistant FSGS can emerge as a promising and efficacious treatment strategy to ensure sustained remission in this subset of patients.

Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma in a Patient With Antiphospholipid Syndrome Treated With Rituximab: A Case Report.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) usually presents with splenomegaly or symptoms related to cytopenia. We report a case of a 56-year-old female with previously diagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) on warfarin therapy who initially presented with abdominal pain and was found to have massive splenomegaly and splenic infarction on CT imaging. Initial clinical presentations and imaging findings were attributed to the subtherapeutic coagulation profile. The patient was later diagnosed with SMZL following workup for pancytopenia including bone marrow biopsy, flow cytometry, and PET scan. Cytopenias, splenomegaly, and abnormal metabolic activity in the spleen on the PET scan improved after treatment with four cycles of weekly rituximab. Our report presents a case of a patient with longstanding APS presenting with splenic infarction and pancytopenia who was subsequently diagnosed with SMZL and successfully treated with rituximab.

Effect of pre-emptive rituximab on EBV DNA levels and prevention of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A case series from the pediatric nephrology research consortium.

BACKGROUND: There are scant data on the effect of rituximab on EBV DNA levels and prevention of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with EBV DNAemia. METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients with EBV DNAemia treated with rituximab to prevent PTLD between 7/1999 and 7/2019 at five pediatric centers were included. Those with confirmed PTLD at the onset of rituximab were excluded. Primary outcomes included percentage change in EBV DNAemia and occurrence of PTLD post rituximab. RESULTS: Twenty-six pediatric kidney transplant recipients were included. Median age at transplant was 4 years (IQR 2.1-10.3). EBV DNA load monitoring by qPCR was performed at 1-3 month intervals. EBV DNAemia onset occurred at a median of 73 days post-transplant (IQR 52-307), followed by DNAemia peak at a median of 268 days (IQR 112-536). Rituximab was administered at a median of 9 days post peak (IQR 0-118). Rituximab regimens varied; median dose 375 mg/m2 (IQR 375-439) weekly for 1-4 doses per course. Following rituximab, EBV DNA load decreased to <10% of baseline at 120 days in 20/26 patients; however, only 30% achieved complete resolution at last follow-up (median 2094 days post-transplant [IQR 1538-3463]). Two (7%) developed PTLD at 915 and 1713 days post rituximab. All recipients had functioning grafts. One death occurred in a child with PTLD following remission due to unrelated reasons. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest pediatric kidney transplant recipient case series with EBV DNAemia given rituximab to prevent PTLD, rituximab achieved a short-term reduction in DNA load; however, recurrent DNAemia is common.

Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab combination therapy for immune idiopathic myopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a rare and heterogenous group diseases, and their treatment is not fully defined yet. According to previous small case series, the combination of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) may be effective in controlling difficult-to-treat patients. Our aim was to further explore the efficacy and safety of this combined approach in patients with IIM. METHODS: Patients with IIM treated with the RTX/MMF combination in our Center were retrospectively identified. After the start of combination therapy, the efficacy was evaluated at 12 months (T12) according the 2016 ACR/EULAR response criteria for IIM. Cardiac imaging and pulmonary function tests were used to monitor disease activity in patients with myocarditis and interstitial lung disease, respectively. Adverse events were recorded over the follow-up period. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients (median age 61 years; 70% female) included in the study, anti-synthetase syndrome was the most prevalent IIM subgroup (60%). At treatment start, muscle, heart, and lung were the most commonly actively affected organs. After 12 months, a moderate or major response was observed in all patients, and creatine kinase was significantly decreased (p-value = 0.012). Cardiac imaging and enzymes monitoring showed a reduction of heart inflammation, while pulmonary function tests improved in patients with lung involvement. No severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show that combination of RTX and MMF is effective and safe in patients with severe and refractory IIM. Therefore, this combined treatment might represent a feasible approach for difficult-to-treat IIM cases.

Hepatitis B relapse after entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide cessation under anti-viral prophylaxis for cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: No study has comparing hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse rates among patients with both cancer and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who completed anti-viral prophylaxis for chemotherapy and then stopped taking entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). METHODS: A total of 227 HBeAg-negative cancer patients without cirrhosis who previously took entecavir (n = 144) or TAF (n = 83) for antiviral prophylaxis were enrolled. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of virological and clinical relapse at 2 years was 37% and 10.4%, respectively, in the entecavir group, and 46.7% and 19.5%, respectively, in the TAF group. The multivariate analysis revealed that the use of hematologic malignancy, TAF use, and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for virological relapse, and use of rituximab, TAF use, higher FIB-4 index and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for clinical relapse. After propensity score-matching, the patients who discontinued TAF therapy still exhibited higher virological (P = 0.031) and clinical relapse rates (P = 0.012) than did those who discontinued entecavir therapy. The patients were allocated to high- (> 2000 IU/mL), moderate- (between 20 and 2000 IU/mL) and low- (< 20 IU/mL) viremia groups. In the high-viremia group, those who had taken TAF for antiviral prophylaxis had higher rates of virological and clinical relapse than did those who had taken entecavir; in the moderate- and low-viremia groups, no significant difference in virological and clinical relapse rates was detected between the entecavir and TAF groups. Three patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon clinical relapse. All three patients were lymphoma and underwent rituximab therapy. One patient developed acute on chronic liver failure and died even though timely retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with both cancer and CHB who underwent antiviral prophylaxis, TAF use was associated with a higher chance of HBV relapse than entecavir use after nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation, particularly in the high-viremia group. Patients who are hematologic malignancy and undergo a rituximab-containing cytotoxic therapy should be monitored closely after withdrawal from prophylactic NA treatment.

FCGR3A-V158F gene polymorphism: A potential predictor for rituximab dosing optimization in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has shown promise in managing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) by depleting B cells and reducing relapses. However, there is no consensus on the optimal RTX dosing regimen, and genetic factors, such as FCGR3A-V158F polymorphism, may influence treatment outcomes. This study investigates how FCGR3A-V158F genotypes influence RTX efficacy in Chinese NMOSD patients under varying dosing regimens and aims to optimize treatment protocols. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 25 Chinese NMOSD patients treated with RTX, grouped into standardized and low-dosage regimens. FCGR3A-V158F genotypes were determined, and treatment responses were evaluated, including relapse rates, time to first relapse (TFR), B-cell depletion, dose adjustments, and treatment retention. RESULTS: Among all patients, 15 received standardized dosages, while 10 received varied induction doses (500 mg to 1200 mg) in low-dose regimens. For FCGR3A-V158F genotypes, 15 had the FF genotype, and 10 were V carriers (3 VV genotype, 7 VF genotype). Regardless of dosing, FF genotype patients had a higher relapse rate post-RTX treatment compared to V carriers (P < 0.05). None of the 3 VV genotype patients in either dose group experienced relapses post-RTX. In both dose groups, FF genotype patients had significantly shorter TFR and required more RTX dose adjustments post-RTX treatment compared to V carriers in the standardized dosage group (P < 0.05). FF genotype patients in the low dosage group were more likely to experience insufficient B-cell depletion, had lower treatment retention rates, and more discontinuations than V carriers in the standardized dosage group (P < 0.05). Insufficient B-cell depletion significantly predicted clinical relapses after RTX treatment (P < 0.05). In survival analysis, FF genotype patients, regardless of dosing, experienced earlier relapses post-RTX treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of RTX dosage selection in NMOSD treatment, particularly for FCGR3A-FF genotype patients. Standard-dose RTX therapy with vigilant monitoring of peripheral blood B-cell levels is recommended for these individuals to optimize treatment efficacy.

Clinical and biochemical evaluation of rituximab as add on therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: The study initially included 40 patients with NMOSD diagnosed, after excluding patients who did not meet the complete inclusion criteria. Patients in the conventional group received routine clinical treatment, while patients in the study group received additional treatment with rituximab on the basis of the conventional treatment. Baseline data and clinically relevant indicators were collected for all patients, and the efficacy was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline data were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). The EDSS scores after clinical treatment in the study group were lower than those in the conventional group, and the difference in EDSS scores before and after treatment was higher than that in the conventional group (p < 0.05). The difference in visual acuity correction before and after treatment was not significant between the two groups (p > 0.05). Laboratory indicators in the study group after clinical treatment were superior to those in the conventional group (all p < 0.05). The recurrence rate after clinical treatment in the study group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Adverse reactions after clinical treatment in the study group were less than those in the conventional group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found that rituximab demonstrated significant efficacy in the acute attacks and recurrence prevention of NMOSD, emphasizing its relatively good safety and tolerability. It highlights the potential of rituximab in treating NMOSD and provides valuable insights for future disease management.

Rituximab potentially improves clinical outcomes of CAR-T therapy for r/r B-ALL via sensitizing leukemia cells to CAR-T-mediated cytotoxicity and reducing CAR-T exhaustion.

PURPOSE: Despite chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has achieved great advances in recent year, approximately 50% of relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL) patients treated with CAR-T experience relapse 6 months post CAR-T treatment. CD20 express on 30 to 50% of B-ALL, which makes CD20 Monoclonal Antibody as one of the potential therapy strategies to decrease the tumor burden and improve the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. Adding Rituximab to chemotherapy protocol had been demonstrated to improve the outcome for CD20-positive ALL. However, rare study explored the influence of Rituximab combined with CAR-T therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 20 r/r B-ALL patients who received CAR-T therapy, all of whom had failed multiple lines of therapy. Before CAR-T infusion, we administered Rituximab to 10 patients with high CD20 expression at a dose of 375 mg/m2 for 1 day. Meanwhile, we selected 10 patients with the comparable features who underwent CAR-T treatment without Rituximab in the same period as the control group. In vitro, the surface molecule expression and killing of CAR-T post Rituximab-treated B-ALL cells co-incubated with CAR-T cells were detected by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The median follow-up of Rituximab and Control groups were 29.27 and 9.83 months. We found that adding Rituximab may confer a favorable prognosis compared with Control group. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates both were longer in the Rituximab group (90% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.0342; 41.7% vs. 25%, p = 0.308). In vitro, we observed that Rituximab-treated tumour cells are more sensitive to CAR-T killing and a broad range of cytokines and chemokines were produced when Rituximab-treated Nalm-6 cells co-cultured with 19-22CAR-T cells, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). To investigate whether Rituximab has an effect on CAR-T persistence, we stimulated CAR-T cells repeatedly in vitro with Rituximab-treated Nalm-6 to evaluate the changes in CAR-T surface exhaustion molecules at different times. We found that the expression of exhaustion molecules (LAG-3, PD-1, TIM-3) on CAR-T cells were significantly lower in the Rituximab group than in the Control group. CONCLUSION: Rituximab combined with CAR-T therapy is effective for improving the long-term prognosis of B-ALL patients who have failed multiple lines of therapy. In vitro, we observed that rituximab potentially improves CAR-T efficacy by sensitizing ALL to CART-mediated cytotoxicity and reducing CAR-T exhaustion.

Current and future advances in practice: IgG4-related disease.

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an increasingly recognized cause of fibroinflammatory lesions in patients of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and is associated with an increased risk of death. The aetiology of IgG4-RD is incompletely understood, but evidence to date suggests that B and T cells are important players in pathogenesis, both of which are key targets of ongoing drug development programmes. The diagnosis of IgG4-RD requires clinicopathological correlation because there is no highly specific or sensitive test. Glucocorticoids are highly effective, but their use is limited by toxicity, highlighting the need for studies investigating the efficacy of glucocorticoid-sparing agents. B cell-targeted therapies, particularly rituximab, have demonstrated benefit, but no randomized clinical trials have evaluated their efficacy. If untreated or under-treated, IgG4-RD can cause irreversible organ damage, hence close monitoring and consideration for long-term immunosuppression is warranted in certain cases.

Monoclonal antibody therapies for aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.

Monoclonal antibody therapies mark the new era of targeted treatment for relapse prevention in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD). For over a decade, rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting agent, had been the most effectiveness treatment for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor, was also observed to be effective. In 2019, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials were completed that demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of eculizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor), inebilizumab (anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting agent), and satralizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of specific treatments for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD for the first time. Most recently, ravulizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor) was also shown to be highly efficacious in an open-label, external-controlled trial. Although only some patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) warrant immunotherapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment for relapse prevention in MOGAD. Observational studies showed that tocilizumab was associated with a decrease in relapses, whereas rituximab seemed to have less robust effectiveness in MOGAD compared to AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Herein, we review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of each monoclonal antibody therapy used in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD and MOGAD, including special considerations in children and women of childbearing potential.

Case report: EBV-related eye orbits and sinuses lymphohistiocytic infiltration responsive to rituximab in a patient with X lymphoproliferative syndrome type 1.

Background and aims: X lymphoproliferative syndrome type 1 (XLP1) is a rare inborn error of immunity due to mutations of SH2D1A, encoding for slam-associated protein (SAP). The clinical phenotype includes severe mononucleosis, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and B-cell lymphomas. Methods: We report the case of a child affected with XLP1 who presented with an incomplete HLH, triggered by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and treated with rituximab, involving orbits and paranasal sinuses. Results: The lesion was indistinguishable from lymphoma, complicating diagnosis and treatment. In addition, considering the high incidence of lymphoma in patients with XLP1, histology helped define its nature, driving therapeutic choices. Conclusion: We described an unusual presentation of incomplete HLH in a patient affected with XLP1: an EBV-driven infiltration of the orbits and paranasal sinuses. This led us to a challenging differential diagnosis of lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic syndrome, which can be frequently observed in patients with XLP1. Considering the extremely poor prognosis of this clinical finding, we sought for a prompt diagnosis and managed to obtain it and to immediately establish the right treatment on the basis of the pathological finding.

An Acute Infection due to Hepatitis E in the Context of a Patient with Rituximab and Methotrexate Therapy.

Background: This report presents the influence of immunosuppression by new rheumatological therapies on hepatitis E virus infection in a 54-year-old male patient with an anti-synthetase syndrome and treatment with methotrexate and rituximab. Case description: The patient arrived at the Emergency Department with epigastric pain, vomiting and dark urine. Initial examination revealed signs of inflammation and hepatic dysfunction. Subsequent laboratory tests and imaging confirmed acute hepatitis E infection in the context of recent initiation of rituximab therapy. Despite initial suspicion of pancreatitis, subsequent investigations ruled out pancreatic involvement. Treatment with ribavirin, along with supportive measures, led to significant clinical improvement with resolution of jaundice, ascites, and oedema. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of considering hepatitis E in patients with autoimmune conditions, especially when initiating immunosuppressive therapies, a situation that is not well described in scientific literature and is increasingly common, necessitating proper recognition. LEARNING POINTS: Suspect hepatitis E virus infection in the presence of persistent liver failure of unknown cause.Recognise immunosuppression as a cause of increased risk of hepatitis E infection.Take into account the repercussions of immunosuppressive therapy such as rituximab regarding hepatitis E infections in immunocompromised patients.